Xpdeep

RESOURCES

Go deeperwhere it matters.

Articles, technical notes and evidence on model-level structural control, bounded AI authority and the industrial systems they make possible.

ARTICLES
Strategic or conceptual explanations written for a mixed executive / technical audience.
TECHNICAL NOTES
Deeper explanations of Xpdeep mechanisms and engineering boundaries.
EVIDENCE
Validated figures with their attribution, and an anonymized programme example.
DOCUMENTATION ↗
Direct link to the separately managed Xpdeep documentation environment.

EXECUTIVE ENTRY · ARTICLE · STRATEGY

A model can be accurate and still leave consequential decisions to a human, and keep machines behind conservative margins, extra sensing and blocked functions.

The constraint is not intelligence alone. It is whether the model can carry a defined decision inside known conditions and hand back when those conditions no longer hold.

FOR ENGINEERING READERS · ARTICLE

Post-hoc explanation vs structural model control: what actually changes?

Post-hoc methods analyse a model from outside it. Xpdeep reads learned structure from the model itself, Retrofit for an existing PyTorch model, Native when structure is learned with the prediction, which changes how models are designed, operated and evolved on the machine.

POST-HOC

POST-HOC ANALYSIS

BLACK BOX

versus

STRUCTURAL

STRUCTURAL OUTPUT

READABLE MODEL

Read the comparison →

SUGGESTED READING SEQUENCE

Suggested reading sequence

  1. 01

    Why prediction is not enough

    Article · the executive argument

  2. 02

    The integrated decision object

    Technical note · the output in detail

  3. 03

    Post-hoc, Native and Retrofit compared

    Article · the detailed comparison

  4. 04

    Three loops only the model can close

    Technical note · links to Technology Three Loops

  5. 05

    From assistance to bounded AI authority

    Article · where to start and how to extend

  6. 06

    Sector applications and validated evidence

    Industries page · evidence on Technology

Resource index

  • TECHNICAL NOTE

    TECHNOLOGY

    The integrated decision object

    What changes when the model returns more than a prediction?

    Prediction, structural explanation and attributed domain state in one forward pass, plus, when useful and supported, a separate prescriptive inference with its justification. The input a machine needs before customer rules decide ACT, HOLD or ESCALATE.

  • ARTICLE

    STRATEGY / APPLICATIONS

    From assistance to bounded AI authority

    Choose one funded decision, agree its KPI and assessment conditions, then use measured evidence to decide whether to expand its scope.

    A practical Capture / Expand / Transform progression, with customer constraints, engineering judgment and exceptions explicit. Transformation remains a design horizon, not a precondition.

    Industrial · Mission-critical

  • TECHNICAL NOTE

    TECHNOLOGY / ENGINEERING

    Three loops only the model can close

    How engineers move from reading and editing learned structure to using model outputs and validating targeted corrections between operating periods.

    The sequence and boundary of each model-level loop, where Native is required, and why the customer's wider lifecycle and system authority remain separate.

    Time series

  • TECHNICAL NOTE

    ENGINEERING

    Native vs Retrofit

    A mode-selection guide: inspect a frozen PyTorch model with Retrofit, or use Native when targeted structural editing, optimization or controlled correction is required.

    Assess architecture-and-weights access, the work the team needs to do, and the distinct compute, latency and memory considerations on the intended target.

    Embedded

  • TECHNICAL NOTE

    TECHNOLOGY

    Knowing when the model has left what it learned

    How attributed domain state differs from confidence, and how a graded indication can focus an investigation of a changed input.

    For temporal data, examine responsible variables and time windows. Unusual does not automatically mean invalid, and in-domain does not automatically mean safe to act on.

    On image and video, the offering covers structural explanation, attributed domain state and design-loop capabilities. There is no image-level prescription.

    Time series · Vision

  • ARTICLE

    APPLICATIONS / OEM

    From conservative limits to condition-aware performance

    How to distinguish a customer hard limit from a margin held for uncertainty, and assess whether some margin could become conditionally usable.

    Dynamic operating headroom is a hypothesis under exploration: characterize the relevant state, define a bounded operating choice and evaluate it against a baseline, with customer hard limits unchanged.

    OEM · Embedded · Industrial

  • ARTICLE

    TECHNOLOGY / VISION

    Why a heatmap is not a model explanation

    A heatmap can be a useful visual check. Structural explanation and attributed domain state address different questions about the model and its input.

    Turn a region-level observation into an engineering review without treating a visualization as a causal diagnosis, permission to act or a complete model assessment.

    Vision

  • TECHNICAL NOTE

    ENGINEERING / TIME SERIES

    What signal-level explanation means

    Why a global variable ranking may miss what carried one temporal output, and how to examine its time windows, variables and signal morphology together.

    Use localization to focus model, measurement and possible-fault investigations. The approved retained-sensor example shows why engineering judgment cannot be replaced by an average ranking.

    Time series · MedTech · Industrial

  • EVIDENCE

    Selected validated results

    Figures come from different programmes and are not all from one project.

    105 → 19
    input variables · up to 82% fewer input variables at equal or better accuracy
    Selected validated results across Confiance.AI and client programmes
    Up to 4×
    faster model development
    Selected validated results across Confiance.AI and client programmes
    Up to 35×
    faster inference
    Independent programme evaluation
    Up to 50%
    smaller models
    Independent programme evaluation
    8% vs 12%
    of ROM: 8% for the Xpdeep model vs 12% for the state-of-the-art model (virtual temperature sensors)
    Unnamed European Tier-1 OEM, on its own embedded target
    12+
    enterprises on the Xpdeep platform
    Company figure

    PROGRAMME EXAMPLE · ANONYMIZED CLIENT PROGRAMME

    A sensor a global ranking would have rated low

    On a virtual sensor programme, structural analysis identified a sensor that was marginal to overall accuracy but carried the model into a specific predictive region. The client’s engineering team retained it for safety reasons; a global importance ranking would have rated it low.

    Input reduction is an engineering decision the customer’s team makes with the structure in view, not an automatic cut.

  • DOCUMENTATION ↗

    Developer documentation

    APIs, PyTorch integration, deployment and runtime interfaces.

Next steps

Need the implementation details?

Documentation →

Have a model or decision loop to discuss?

Talk to us →